He needed to carefully consider the matter at hand.
Only then could he lead others to have a misleading understanding of the issue.
Thus, allowing the situation to develop in the direction he hoped for.
But, could this really be successful?
It meant that eventually, there would be no need for too much of what seemed to be the most effective and appropriate handling of the issue.
From the beginning, there would be a very appropriate clear recognition of the problem.
The remaining responses would lead to what appeared to be very good and candid awareness.
The situation would then become unsatisfactorily irrevocable when it came to the frank restoration to the issue.
He would be able to make a very good and appropriate analysis of the issue under such circumstances.
Possibly, it might stem from the understanding and clear judgment formed deep within himself regarding the issue.
