Once again facing what is seen before the eyes, it seems like having already attained the most detailed understanding one could have about the problem.
A clearer way of dealing with the problem.
And then, what further understanding and approach to the problem is needed thereafter.
So in the end, what kind of common understanding and handling of the problem will be acceptable to people, and how will a clear and satisfactory answer emerge?
It starts with a common ideal perception of the problem that seems to be the most satisfactory.
It seems that at this point, the conclusion has thus completely changed into something else - remembered under a cognition of analysis and doubt.
So what remains is the hesitation over what seems like a more appropriate understanding and awareness of the problem that still needs to be developed.
Then to engage in what seems to be the most satisfactory, a good understanding and clear recognition of concern for the problem.
